An in principle different approach was proposed by
Gilbert [18] in 1955, who observed that since the
conservative equation (1.80) can be
derived from a Lagrangian formulation where the role of the
generalized coordinates is played by the components of
magnetization vector
. In this framework, the most
natural way to introduce phenomenological dissipation occurs by
introducing a kind of `viscous' force, whose components are
proportional to the time derivatives of the generalized
coordinates. More specifically, he introduces the following
additional torque term:
(1.82)
which correspond to the torque produced by a field
, where is
the Gilbert damping constant, depending on the material (typical
values are in the range
). We observe that,
similarly to the case of Landau-Lifshitz equation, the additional
term introduced by Gilbert preserves the magnetization
magnitude1.4. In the following section, when
we will analyze the fundamental properties of magnetization
dynamics, we will show that the Gilbert damping is connected to
the assumption of a suitable Rayleigh dissipation function.
Therefore, the precessional equation
(1.80), modified according to Gilbert's
work, is generally referred to as Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert
equation:
(1.83)
There is substantial difference between Landau-Lifshitz and
Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations although they are very similar
from mathematical point of view. For instance, Landau-Lifshitz
equation (1.81) can be obtained easily from
Gilbert equation. In fact, by vector multiplying both sides of
Eq. (1.83) by
, one obtains:
(1.84)
remembering the vector identity
and observing that
(see section
1.3.5), one ends up with:
(1.85)
By substituting the latter equation in the right hand side of
Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation (1.83), one has:
(1.86)
The latter equation can be appropriately recast to obtain the
following expression:
(1.87)
which is commonly referred to as Landau-Lifshitz equation in the
Gilbert form. One can immediately notice that
Eq.(1.87) and
Eq. (1.81) are mathematically the same,
provided that one assumes:
(1.88)
Moreover, the work of Podio-Guidugli [82] has pointed out
that both Landau-Lifshitz and Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equations
belong to the same family of damped gyromagnetic precession
equations. Nevertheless some considerations about the meaning of
the quantity , which indeed is the ratio between physical
characteristics of the electrons like mass and charge, are
sufficient to say that Eqs. (1.81) and
(1.83) express different physics and are identical
only in the limit of vanishing damping. Moreover, first
Kikuchi [30] and then Mallinson [29]
have pointed out that in the limit of infinite damping
(
in Eq. (1.81),
in Eq. (1.83)), the
Landau-Lifshitz equation and the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation
give respectively:
(1.89)
Since the second result is in agreement with the fact that a very
large damping should produce a very slow motion while the first is
not, one may conclude that the
Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (1.83) equation is more
appropriate to describe magnetization dynamics. In this thesis,
from now on, we will use the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert
equation (1.83).
Next:1.3.4 Normalized equations Up:1.3 The Dynamic Equation Previous:1.3.2 The Landau-Lifshitz equationContents
Massimiliano d'Aquino
2005-11-26